The upcoming Vice Presidential debate has sparked a heated controversy over CBS's decision not to fact-check the candidates live. CBS has announced that its moderators will allow the candidates to fact-check each other, with a misinformation unit providing real-time updates through an online live blog and post-debate analysis. This decision has drawn immediate backlash from journalists and media watchdogs who argue that CBS is abdicating its journalistic responsibilities. The network's approach contrasts sharply with that of ABC News, which faced fierce criticism from the Trump campaign for directly addressing inaccuracies in a previous debate.

J.D. Vance, the running mate of Donald Trump, has been at the center of this controversy. Known for his incendiary rhetoric, Vance has accused migrants of heinous acts and has normalized school shootings as 'part of life.' His extreme views have even led some to say that he makes Trump appear moderate in comparison. Vance's comments have not only raised eyebrows but also contributed to a climate of misinformation that CBS's debate strategy fails to adequately address.

Additionally, a UBS Investor Watch report has shed light on the political preferences of wealthy individuals and business owners. The report indicates that 57% of affluent voters support Kamala Harris, whereas 53% of small business owners back Donald Trump. Economic issues, social security, and tax policies are the main concerns among these groups, with both wealthy individuals and business owners expressing greater trust in Trump's ability to handle economic matters.

The rhetoric surrounding this election has reached new heights, with Trump unleashing a barrage of personal attacks against Kamala Harris. Over a recent weekend, Trump repeatedly referred to Harris as 'mentally handicapped,' comments that have not only angered Democrats but also drawn rebukes from some Republicans. Noteworthy figures like Senator Lindsey Graham and Maryland Governor Larry Hogan have publicly criticized Trump's approach, arguing that policy-focused attacks would be more effective and less divisive.

Meanwhile, the Republican Vice Presidential candidate J.D. Vance continues to make headlines for his extreme views. Vance's campaign has been marked by statements that have raised concerns among voters and pundits alike. From spreading falsehoods about immigrants to advocating for radical changes in public education, Vance's positions contribute to the growing polarization in American politics. His approach to the upcoming debate against Tim Walz suggests a continuation of these tactics.

Despite these controversies, Vance's campaign remains confident. Unlike his opponent Tim Walz, who is rigorously preparing for the debate, Vance has stated that he does not need extensive preparation. This cavalier attitude aligns with Trump's broader campaign strategy but raises questions about the effectiveness and responsibility of such an approach.

This election cycle has been unlike any other, characterized by extreme views, personal attacks, and a significant focus on fact-checking—or the lack thereof. As the Vice Presidential debate looms, the spotlight falls not only on the candidates but also on the media's role in ensuring a fair and informed public discourse. The decisions made by networks like CBS will undoubtedly shape the narrative and impact voter perceptions in the crucial weeks leading up to the election.